Page: 1 2 3
Housecarl 1066
Registered user
Registered: 02-2006
Location: Northern-most Saxon border.
Posts: 620
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Revised rant of WilliamtheRed
*sigh*
Red, wake up and GROW up! You clearly expect everyone to support and worship your every word! Won't happen.
You still avoid answering the many points about history that you got wrong!
Try presenting anything in a mature and intelligent way yourself, and I will correct you(again!), discussion coward!
What of YOUR 'political credentials'? Dishonest and biased though they are(with bad grammar, etc).
So you're intellectual because you post trollish rants about someone who had Norman hagiographers jutting out of his rear end? (Laugh) My young daughter could get more historical viewpoints accurate than you!
quote: That's not such a tall order given that before Senlac the Conqueror offered to settle the issue with the Usurper by single, mortal combat and so save countless lives
The Normans never lied, did they? And King Harold II, who saved two Norman soldiers on the Brittany campaign from a swamp(Norman sources!), and was renowned for his extreme courage, martial prowess and strength, was a coward? Laughable as well as childish!!
And, try using the 'return' button in future, to ensure that your inaccurate rubbish is legible?
I challenge you!! to produce anything you've already spewed, accepted as factual- you've already got several points wrong in front of everyone on this board, troll.
I could post a long, detailed and accurate thread about King Harold II, but you are incapable of mature discussion, too bigoted a troll, and clearly too immature and craving attention, that it would simply be as pointless as King Harold sending an embassy to the pro-Norman pope
Housecarl (in his own capacity- without the pretencious and immature rubbish, and who knows how to use the return button for new paragraphs!) Grow up, Red, then you'll be able to deal with opposing viewpoints.
Last edited by Housecarl 1066, Feb/24/2006, 8:44 pm
--- http://1066andallthat.forumfree.co.uk/
|
Feb/24/2006, 8:17 pm
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Housecarl 1066
Send PM to Housecarl 1066
|
mousteriana
Registered user
Registered: 03-2005
Posts: 936
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Revised rant of WilliamtheRed
Housecarl:
I know of one time he/they got it wrong. It was kind of "technical", but they still got it wrong. "Senlac" is usually considered to be "Sand Lake". . . and this comes straight from Orderic Vitalis. Well, he/they claimed it was "Blood Lake"(which it sounds like in modern Frnech, it is true), but Orderic said nothing about a "Blood Lake". Oh well, he/they seem to have no use for historians or historical sources.
Anne G
|
Feb/24/2006, 9:26 pm
|
Link to this post
Send Email to mousteriana
Send PM to mousteriana
|
Housecarl 1066
Registered user
Registered: 02-2006
Location: Northern-most Saxon border.
Posts: 620
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Revised rant of WilliamtheRed
Hi Mousteriana
He/she/they/it (WilliamtheFat) is clearly an ignorant, hypocritical and pompous troll, who posts trash to impress either him/herself, or his/her teenage friends!
He/she seems devoid of the necessary maturity and clarity to discuss this topic intelligently and even-handedly or even admit 'he' is very wrong on occasions, and is incapable of adult interaction or fully developed and relevant communication.
'He'- either in his 'official' capacity or private- is just the type of ridiculous, laughable idiot that blusters on in their time honoured(to themselves), blinkered fashion either unaware, or incapable, of seeing the other person's viewpoint through sheer bigotry and indoctrination.
'Red' reminds me of the old-style caricature British MP that loved the sound of their own pompous voice, but actually said nothing truthful, intelligent or interesting, nor ever wiped the rabid foam away from their fat mouth for long enough to listen to anyone or anything else in the vicinity, lest they might learn something!
Last edited by Housecarl 1066, Feb/25/2006, 12:08 pm
--- http://1066andallthat.forumfree.co.uk/
|
Feb/25/2006, 12:02 pm
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Housecarl 1066
Send PM to Housecarl 1066
|
mousteriana
Registered user
Registered: 03-2005
Posts: 936
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Revised rant of WilliamtheRed
Housecarl:
To be absolutely fair, I wouldn't go quite so far as you do. OTOH, he/she/it seem or seems to have done no serious reading on the subject.
Anne G
quote: Housecarl 1066 wrote:
Hi Mousteriana
He/she/they/it (WilliamtheFat) is clearly an ignorant, hypocritical and pompous troll, who posts trash to impress either him/herself, or his/her teenage friends!
He/she seems devoid of the necessary maturity and clarity to discuss this topic intelligently and even-handedly or even admit 'he' is very wrong on occasions, and is incapable of adult interaction or fully developed and relevant communication.
'He'- either in his 'official' capacity or private- is just the type of ridiculous, laughable idiot that blusters on in their time honoured(to themselves), blinkered fashion either unaware, or incapable, of seeing the other person's viewpoint through sheer bigotry and indoctrination.
'Red' reminds me of the old-style caricature British MP that loved the sound of their own pompous voice, but actually said nothing truthful, intelligent or interesting, nor ever wiped the rabid foam away from their fat mouth for long enough to listen to anyone or anything else in the vicinity, lest they might learn something!
|
Feb/25/2006, 10:16 pm
|
Link to this post
Send Email to mousteriana
Send PM to mousteriana
|
Housecarl 1066
Registered user
Registered: 02-2006
Location: Northern-most Saxon border.
Posts: 620
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Revised rant of WilliamtheRed
I take no prisoners with morons of Red's ilk- uneducated, ignorant and incapable of detailed, accurate and adult conversation as they are.
He/they call others that post here, making childish statements, yet refuse point blank to reply to each valid point made against theirs.
Last edited by Housecarl 1066, Feb/25/2006, 11:05 pm
--- http://1066andallthat.forumfree.co.uk/
|
Feb/25/2006, 10:58 pm
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Housecarl 1066
Send PM to Housecarl 1066
|
Thjodolf
Registered user
Registered: 03-2006
Posts: 5
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Revised rant of WilliamtheRed
"Housecarl
The Housecarls on Senlac were Danes,you know.Are you pro-Cnut,pro-Estrithsson or pro-Usurper?
Lydia Giles, Chairperson (on behalf of TWTRF2002)"
May I ask what the above statement concerning the 'Danes' at Senlac is based on? Are we to assume it originates from the Gesta Guillelmi ii.16 where William of Poitiers states "...the Danes (who were allied by blood) also sent copious forces"? That 'fact is certainly not mentioned by William of Jumieges or the enigmatic Carmen. One would imagine that William of Poitiers, having made grandiose claims concerning the 'support' garnered by William to support his enterprise (Denmark, France and the Empire), needed to explain why the invasion force was supplemented by mercenary troops and not the arms of such powerful 'allies'. William of Poitiers, writing, at best, in the mid-1070s, seems to be express anti-Danish sentiments, most probably influenced by the Danish incursions of 1069-70 and the dangers posed in 1075. William of Poitiers, the Norman panegyrist, writing after the death of Sweyn Esthridsson, would have been well aware that the Danes maintained an interest in the English throne and by associating the Danish king with the 'usurper' Harold, William may have hoped to 'harm' the Danish case.
|
Mar/16/2006, 10:51 am
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Thjodolf
Send PM to Thjodolf
|
Housecarl 1066
Registered user
Registered: 02-2006
Location: Northern-most Saxon border.
Posts: 620
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Revised rant of WilliamtheRed
Thjodolf
Interesting response, however, I wouldn't expect an immediate(if one at all) reply to your intelligent, well-researched and informative post, as WTRF easily back down from accurate detail which exposes their dumbness & ignorance, and blatantly bypass anything historical that is better-presented than their own immature fascism.
Regards.
--- http://1066andallthat.forumfree.co.uk/
|
Mar/18/2006, 8:32 am
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Housecarl 1066
Send PM to Housecarl 1066
|
mousteriana
Registered user
Registered: 03-2005
Posts: 936
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Revised rant of WilliamtheRed
Housecarl and Thjiodolf:
I've asked the WRTF for the sources on which they base their, uh, conclusions. I'm still waiting.
Anne G
|
Mar/18/2006, 9:04 pm
|
Link to this post
Send Email to mousteriana
Send PM to mousteriana
|
Add a reply
Page: 1 2 3
You are not logged in ( login)
|