quote:

---

ouija666 wrote:

The Conqueror was born in 1027,the son of Duke Robert the Devil (aka “the Magnificent”) and Herleve of Falaise who was a tanner’s daughter. He was Duke of Normandy 1035-87 and King of Angleland 1066-87.
And illegitimate = a bastard

Following Varaville, spread the dynamics of The Norman Revolution to Ponthieu, Vexin , Brittany and crucially: Maine(1064) increasing its power and influence to great effect. He also cemented alliances involving landed, church and military interests in Normandy to firm up the ideological power of the Revolution.

The Conqueror married Matilda of Flanders in 1051. This also involved an alliance with her father Baldwin V.
Who did NOTHING to back the bastard

In 1051 Edward the Confessor acknowledged the Conqueror as his successor either directly or through an intermediary who was probably Robert de Jumieges.
"probably" Jumieges- this sums it all up! Apart from the witan and King Edward, then?

In 1064, Harold Godwineson swore allegiance to the Conqueror as the Confessor’s successor in Angleland.
"Over 'hidden relics' yes- deciet and enforced, thus invalid

When Godwineson usurped Angleland’s throne in the counter-revolution of January 1066, the Conqueror assembled an alliance of politico-military forces inside The Frankish Kingdom and gained the support of Pope Alexander 11 to assert his just right to rule in Angleland.
As already said- the witan and King Edward elected Harold as KING! And..."revolution? LOL, grow up, commies!

The Conqueror annihilated the Usurper and his oppressive, ruling class at the Battle of Senlac Hill (aka Hastings) on 14th October 1066. The revolutionist, Frank-Viking ruling class who replaced them, expropriated that ex-ruling class’ land and wealth to finance the export of The Norman Revolution to the remainder of the The Frankish Kingdom with the ultimate aim of putting a Frank-Viking on the Frankish throne and generating the fusion of the most advanced, historical forces of Scandinavia and The Kingdom of The Franks, at the highest leadership level. There is also evidence that the Conqueror exploited the divisions inside and between Angleland and Scandinavia as a catalyst to facilitate this historic victory. The highest expression of his consummate, revolutionary skill in this regard was the evidence albeit by no means conclusive for all traditions, of what de facto was a temporary alliance with Hardraada to implement a two-front war on the Usurper.
You 'tards call this intelligent or logical? LOL - it doesn't even have pubes! "Expropriation"?= forceful redistribution of private property, yes!

A series of counter-revolutionary uprisings from 1067-1075 were defeated, chief among which was The Northern Rising 1069-1070 which combined with a Danish counter-revolutionary thrust ordered by Sweyn Esrithsen.
You fags really are hung up on imaginary revolutions, huh?

The Conqueror ordered the first, permanent settlements of Jewish people in Angleland’s history. This order ended a 1000-year-old-plus, racist, exclusion order on this unjustly persecuted people which was based on the big lie that they killed Jesus Christ and not the Roman Empire. Permanent settlements of Jewish people had existed in Normandy since the 10th Century. Allied to this policy was the Conqueror’s strong belief in Cluniacism and a firm identification with St Stephen the Protomartyr who historically occupies the politico-military-ideological-religious terrain which separates the original teachings of Jesus Christ and his brother, James the Just from Paulian revisionism. We do not believe it was anything other than personal identification that the Conqueror chose to be crowned ruler of Angleland one day before the Protomartyr’s feast day which is on 26th December.
Ah, so reveals the gay juden WTRF to the website...that they don't own!
The Conqueror ordered a massive, church and castle-building program in Angleland to provide a dynamic infrastructure from which to implement The Norman Revolution and combined with the leading force of Normandy, to export that Revolution to the remainder of The Frankish Kingdom and ultimately to put a Frank-Viking in power to rule that Kingdom.
So let's also forgive the nazi forced labour programs in a cowed Frankland of WWII then?

During his spectacular victory over Philippe 1 at Mantes in 1087 and so defeating the second counter-revolutionary thrust of 1086-1087, the Conqueror was fatally wounded in mysterious circumstances, dying later at St Gervais on the outskirts of Rouen on 9TH September 1087.
And robbed and abandoned by 'retainers' before being popped open like a sour melon!
In his deathbed speech, he left Angleland not to another monarch but to God. No monarch of Angleland/England/ UK in his/her death process has ever done that before or since.
Sources? How do you amusing !@#$ know?

---

quote:

---

WilliamtheRed Forum1 wrote:

Ouija666,
In your Topic title you make an assumption about the private,political or otherwise views of members of our Forum about whom you know nothing.This is unacceptable and I request you retract or provide an acceptable justification.Unless or until you do so,there will be no further dialogue with you by any member of our Forum on this Chatboard or elsewhere.

Bill H,Chairperson (on behalf of WTRF)

---